<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
\n\tPervari’ye ba\u011fl\u0131 Belenoluk ve D\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnc\u00fcler k\u00f6y\u00fc sakinleri aras\u0131nda 29 May\u0131s 2010’da arazi meselesi nedeniyle \u00e7\u0131kan Remzi Sevin\u00e7’in (37) hayat\u0131n\u0131 kaybetti\u011fi, 2 ki\u015finin yaraland\u0131\u011f\u0131 silahl\u0131 kavgaya ili\u015fkin y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturmada tutuklanan Hasan V. ve Abit U. hakk\u0131nda “kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrme” su\u00e7undan m\u00fcebbet hapis cezas\u0131 istemiyle dava a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131.<\/p>\n
\n\tSiirt 1. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi’nde yarg\u0131lanan tutuklu san\u0131klar Hasan V. ve Abit U’ya 18 Nisan 2018’de g\u00f6r\u00fclen karar duru\u015fmas\u0131nda “kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrme” su\u00e7undan m\u00fcebbet hapis verildi.<\/p>\n
\n\tYerel mahkemenin verdi\u011fi karara san\u0131k avukatlar\u0131 itirazda bulundu.<\/p>\n
\n\t\u0130tirazlar\u0131 de\u011ferlendiren Gaziantep B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesince 21 \u015eubat 2019’da istinaf ba\u015fvurular\u0131n\u0131n esastan reddine, Yarg\u0131tay 1. Ceza Dairesince de 31 Ekim 2023’te temyiz taleplerinin esastan reddiyle h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin onanmas\u0131na karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\n\tArd\u0131ndan san\u0131k avukatlar\u0131n\u0131n Yarg\u0131tay Ceza Genel Kuruluna yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 itiraz da de\u011ferlendirildi.<\/p>\n
\n\tKurul, 25 \u015eubat 2026’da h\u00fckm\u00fcn bozulmas\u0131na karar vererek dosyay\u0131 Siirt 1. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesine g\u00f6nderdi.<\/p>\n
\n\tSan\u0131klar\u0131n Siirt 1. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi’nde 18 Haziran’da yeniden yarg\u0131lanmalar\u0131na ba\u015fland\u0131.<\/p>\n
\n\tDavada daha \u00f6nce g\u00fcvenlik gerek\u00e7esiyle yap\u0131lamayan ke\u015fif 10 y\u0131l sonra g\u00fcvenli\u011fin tesis edilmesiyle 7 Eyl\u00fcl’de yap\u0131ld\u0131.<\/p>\n
\n\tMahkeme heyetince Belenoluk k\u00f6y\u00fcn\u00fcn zorlu arazi ko\u015fullar\u0131ndaki Katu Da\u011f\u0131 mevkisinde ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen ke\u015ffe ili\u015fkin tespitler rapora d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fclerek dosyaya eklendi.<\/p>\n
\n\tRaporda, “San\u0131klar\u0131n bulundu\u011fu konumdan kala\u015fnikof tipi t\u00fcfe\u011fin m\u00fchimmat\u0131n\u0131n maktul\u00fc \u00f6ld\u00fcrmeye elveri\u015fli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131” tespiti yer ald\u0131.<\/p>\n
\n\tSiirt 1. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi’nde d\u00fcn g\u00f6r\u00fclen duru\u015fmaya san\u0131klar bulunduklar\u0131 cezaevlerinden Ses ve G\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fc Bili\u015fim Sistemi (SEGB\u0130S) arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla kat\u0131ld\u0131.<\/p>\n
\n\tMahkeme heyeti ba\u015fkan\u0131 Ahmet Ulu\u011f, duru\u015fmada, Belenoluk k\u00f6y\u00fcne yakla\u015f\u0131k 10 kilometre mesafedeki Katu Da\u011f\u0131 b\u00f6lgesinde mahkeme heyeti olarak ke\u015fif yapt\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, haz\u0131rlanan raporun dosyaya eklendi\u011fini belirtti.<\/p>\n
\n\tCumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131 esas hakk\u0131ndaki m\u00fctalaas\u0131nda, san\u0131klar\u0131n “kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrme” su\u00e7undan cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmalar\u0131 ve tutukluluk hallerinin devam\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f bildirdi.<\/p>\n
\n\tSan\u0131klar ve avukatlar\u0131 ise beraat talebinde bulundu.<\/p>\n
\n\tMahkeme heyeti, \u00fczerlerine isnat edilen “kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrme” su\u00e7unu i\u015flediklerinin sabit olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 gerek\u00e7e g\u00f6stererek, san\u0131klar\u0131n beraatine karar verdi.<\/p>\n
\n\tHeyet, karar\u0131n tebli\u011f edilmesinin ard\u0131ndan san\u0131k ve avukatlar\u0131n\u0131n iki hafta i\u00e7erisinde Yarg\u0131tay 1. Ceza Dairesine temyiz ba\u015fvurusunda bulunabileceklerine h\u00fckmetti.<\/p>\n
\n\tSan\u0131k avukatlar\u0131ndan Abd\u00fclaziz \u00d6rek, olay g\u00fcn\u00fcnden bug\u00fcne kadar davada hukuka uygun bir karar\u0131n \u00e7\u0131kmas\u0131 i\u00e7in m\u00fccadele ettiklerini belirtti.<\/p>\n
\n\t2016 y\u0131l\u0131nda da yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcrerken mahkemenin ke\u015fif karar\u0131 verdi\u011fini ifade eden \u00d6rek, \u015funlar\u0131 kaydetti:<\/p>\n
\n\t“G\u00fcvenlik gerek\u00e7esiyle ke\u015fif taleplerimiz reddedildi. 10 y\u0131l sonra dosyaya ili\u015fkin ke\u015fif yap\u0131ld\u0131. Olay\u0131n ya\u015fand\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00fcne ili\u015fkin m\u00fcvekkillerimin bulundu\u011fu yer ile maktul\u00fcn bulundu\u011fu yer aras\u0131nda yakla\u015f\u0131k 3 bin 700 metre mesafe ve 290 metre kot fark\u0131 bulunuyor. M\u00fcvekkillerimin bu su\u00e7u i\u015flemelerinin bu y\u00f6n\u00fcyle m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ke\u015fifle ortaya \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131. Ke\u015fif yap\u0131lmas\u0131yla m\u00fcvekkillerimin at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7a bula\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131k ve net bir \u015fekilde belli olmu\u015ftur. Davada beraat karar\u0131 verildi.”<\/p>\n